TEST REPORT

Publication History

Summary

1. Test Program
2. Equipment Under Test: Configuration (Declared by Provider)
3. Occupied Bandwidth
4. AC Power Line Conducted Emissions
5. Transmitter Radiated Emission
6. Uncertainties Chart

1. Test Program

References:

• 47 CFR Part 15.209 & 15.207
• RSS Gen Issue 4
• ANSI C63.10-2013

Radio Requirement:

(1): Limited program

(2): EUT not directly or indirectly connected to the AC Power Public Network

(3) Testing covered the receive mode, and receiver spurious emissions are considered to be the same as transmitter.

Key: PASS: EUT complies with standard's requirement; FAIL: EUT does not comply with standard's requirement; NA: Not Applicable; NP: Test Not Performed.

2. Equipment Under Test: Configuration (Declared by Provider)

2.1. Informations

Morpho Access SIGMA Extreme is a biometric access controller terminal. The MorphoAccess® Sigma Extreme device family standard models are:

MPH-AC002A: Tests are performed on the most complete Product: MorphoAccess® SIGMA Extreme Prox FFD. The product tested is the most representative product with radio 125kHz and the FFD function.

2.2. Hardware Identification (EUT and Auxiliaries)

Equipment Under Test (EUT): Safran Identity and Security

Serial Number: 11472A-MPHAC002A

Photograph showing the front and back views of the MorphoAccess SIGMA Extreme biometric access controller terminal.

Power Supply

During all the tests, EUT is supplied by Vnom: VAC. For measurement with different voltage, it will be presented in test method.

Inputs/Outputs - Cable:

Auxiliary Equipment Used During Test:

Photograph of the auxiliary power supply unit (FRIWO).

Equipment Information:

2.3. Running Mode

During the test, products must be ON and communication with a PC through ping command. To send the ping command, the laptop must be configured previously as below:

1. Modify IP address of the laptop (Windows 7 procedure):
   • Click on 'Démarrer' menu
   • Click on 'Panneau de configuration' → 'Centre Réseau et partage'
   • Click on 'Modifier les paramètres de la carte'
   • Double click on 'Connexion au réseau local'
   • Double click on 'Protocol Internet version 4 (TCP/IPv4)'
   • Enter fields as below and click on “OK” button:

   Screenshot of a Windows 7 IP configuration dialog box for setting static IP addresses.

2. Open a windows console by clicking simultaneously on the Windows button on the keyboard and the “R” button.
3. The window below will open. Enter 'cmd' in the field and click OK.

Screenshot of the Windows Run dialog box with 'cmd' entered, followed by a command prompt window showing a successful ping command response.

There are two different IP addresses according to the product under test:

• MPH-AC002A - MA-Extreme Prox FFD: IP address = 10.126.46.159
• MPH-AC002B - MA-Extreme iClass FFD: IP address = 10.126.46.159

So one of the two commands below must be sent to the good product:

• MPH-AC002A : ping 10.126.46.159 –t
• MPH-AC002B : ping 10.126.46.159 –t

To validate that the product works properly, the following procedure must be followed:

• Check Ping command response on the laptop. Command response must be successful. Response awaited for MPH-AC002x product: Réponse de 10.126.46.159 : octets=32 temps<1ms TTL=64
• Place your finger on the biometric sensor and after several seconds a closed door must appear on the screen or a second try window then a closed door must appear.
• Place a RFID card below biometric sensor and after several seconds a closed door or a Hold Card pop up must appear on the screen.

2.4. Equipment Labelling

Photograph of the equipment label showing model, serial number, FCC ID, IC ID, and compliance information.

2.5. Equipment Modification

None ⬜ Modification: ✔️

- adding a ferrite reference 7427226 on a flat cable.

3. Occupied Bandwidth

3.1. Test Conditions

Test performed by: Mathieu CERISIER

Date of test: March 13, 2017

Ambient temperature: 25 °C

Relative humidity: 41%

3.2. Test Setup

The Equipment Under Test is installed:

• On a table ⬜
• In an anechoic chamber ✔️

Measurement is performed with a spectrum analyzer in:

• Conducted Method ⬜
• Radiated Method (test Fixture) ✔️

Test Procedure: RSS-Gen Issue 4 § 6.6

Photograph of the test setup for Occupied Bandwidth measurement, showing test equipment and the device under test on a table.

3.1. Limit

None

3.2. Test Equipment List

Note: In our quality system, the test equipment calibration due is more & less 2 months.

3.3. Results

Occupied Bandwidth 125kHz

[Graph displaying the occupied bandwidth measurement for 125kHz, showing frequency on the x-axis and signal amplitude (dBm) on the y-axis, with markers indicating peak, bandwidth, and specific frequency points.]

3.1. Conclusion

Occupied Channel Bandwidth measurement performed on the sample of the product MPH-AC002A SN: 16510MX0000001, in configuration and description presented in this test report, show levels compliant to the RSS-GEN ISSUE 4 limits.

4. AC Power Line Conducted Emissions

4.1. Test Conditions

Test performed by: Laurent DENEUX

Date of test: March 9, 2017 to March 10, 2017

Ambient temperature: 21 °C

Relative humidity: 53%

4.2. Test Setup

The product has been tested according to ANSI C63.10 (2013) method. The EUT is placed on the ground reference plane, at 80cm from the LISN. The distance between the EUT and the vertical ground plane is 40cm. Auxiliaries are powered by another LISN. The cable has been shorted to 1 meter length. The EUT is powered through the LISN. Measurement is made with a receiver in peak mode. This was followed by a Quasi-Peak, i.e. CISPR measurement for any strong signal. If the average limit is met when using a Quasi-Peak detector, the EUT shall be deemed to meet both limits and measurement with the average detector is unnecessary. The LISN (measure) is 50Ω / 50μH. Interconnecting cables and equipment's were moved to position that maximized emission.

Photograph of the test setup for AC Power Line Conducted Emissions (Front view).

Rear view photograph of the AC Power Line Conducted Emissions test setup.

4.3. Limit

Quasi-Peak:

• 0.15kHz to 0.5MHz: 66dBμV to 56dBμV*
• 0.5MHz to 5MHz: 56dBμV
• 5MHz to 30MHz: 60dBμV

Average:

• 0.15kHz to 0.5MHz: 56dBμV to 46dBμV*
• 0.5MHz to 5MHz: 46dBμV
• 5MHz to 30MHz: 50dBμV

*Decreases with the logarithm of the frequency

4.4. Test Equipment List

Note: In our quality system, the test equipment calibration due is more & less 2 months.

4.5. Divergence, Addition or Suppression on the Test Specification

None ⬜ Divergence: ⬜

4.6. Results

Graphs displaying AC Power Line Conducted Emission results for the Phase and Line connections, showing measured peak and average levels against regulatory limits.

4.7. Conclusion

AC Power Line Conducted Emission measurement performed on the sample of the product MPH-AC002A SN: 16510MX0000001, in configuration and description presented in this test report, show levels compliant to the 47 CFR PART 15.207 & RSS Gen ISSUE 4 limits.

5. Transmitter Radiated Emission

5.1. Test Conditions

Test performed by: Laurent DENEUX

Date of test: March 9, 2017 to March 10, 2017

Ambient temperature: 18 °C

Relative humidity: 47%

5.2. Test Setup

The product has been tested according to ANSI C63.10 (2013). The EUT is placed on an open area test site. Distance between measuring antenna and the EUT is 3m.

Test is performed in parallel and perpendicular axis with a loop antenna below 30MHz. Measurement bandwidth was 200Hz below 150kHz and 9kHz between 150kHz & 30MHz. The level has been maximised by the turntable rotation of 360 degrees range on the 3 axis of EUT. Antenna height was 1m.

Test is performed in horizontal (H) and vertical (V) polarization with bilog between 30MHz & 1GHz and with a horn antenna above 1GHz. Measurement bandwidth was 120kHz below 1GHz and 1MHz above 1GHz. The level has been maximised by the turntable rotation of 360 degrees range on the 3 axis of EUT. Antenna height search was performed from 1 to 4m. The EUT is placed at 1.5m high above 1GHz and at 0.8m high under 1GHz.

Distance between measuring antenna and the EUT is 10m.

Photographs illustrating the test setup for Transmitter Radiated Emission measurements, showing the device under test in an anechoic chamber or open area test site with antennas.

5.3. Limit

Limit at 3m:

• 9kHz to 0.490MHz: 2400/F(kHz)μV/m (300m) or 20log(2400/F(kHz))dBμV/m (3m) QPeak
• 0.490MHz to 1.705MHz: 240000/F(kHz)μV/m (30m) or 20log(240000/F(kHz))dBμV/m (3m) QPeak
• 1.705MHz to 30MHz: 30μV/m (30m) or dBuV/m (3m) QPeak
• 30MHz to 88MHz: 40dBμV/m QPeak
• 88MHz to 216MHz: 43.5dBμV/m QPeak
• 216MHz to 960MHz: 46dBμV/m QPeak
• 960MHz to 1000MHz: 54dBμV/m QPeak
• Above 1000MHz: 74dBuV/m Peak, 54dBμV/m Average

Limit at 10m:

• 30MHz to 88MHz: 29.5dBμV/m QPeak
• 88MHz to 216MHz: 33dBμV/m QPeak
• 216MHz to 960MHz: 35.5dBμV/m QPeak
• 960MHz to 1000MHz: 43.5dBμV/m QPeak
• Above 1000MHz: 63.5dBμV/m Peak, 43.5dBμV/m Average

5.4. Test Equipment List

Note: In our quality system, the test equipment calibration due is more & less 2 months.

5.5. Divergence, Addition or Suppression on the Test Specification

None ⬜ Divergence: ⬜

5.6. Results

Graph showing Transmitter Radiated Emission results for frequencies between 30MHz and 1GHz, displaying measured quasi-peak levels against limits for vertical and horizontal polarization.

Graphs showing Transmitter Radiated Emission results for frequencies above 1GHz, displaying measured peak and average levels against limits for vertical and horizontal polarization.

Tables summarizing measured QPeak levels and limits for Transmitter Radiated Emissions below 30MHz for perpendicular and parallel antenna orientations.

Tables detailing Transmitter Radiated Emission results (QPeak Level and Limit) for frequencies between 30MHz and 1GHz, categorized by polarization (Vertical, Horizontal).

5.7. Conclusion

Unwanted Emission in restricted frequency bands measurement performed on the sample of the MPH-AC002A, SN: 16510MX0000001, in configuration and description presented in this test report, show levels compliant to the 47 CFR PART 15.209 & RSS-Gen ISSUE 4 limits.

6. Uncertainties Chart

Table listing the "Uncertainties Chart" for various test kinds, including wide uncertainty laboratory values and uncertainty limits.

The uncertainty values calculated by the laboratory are lower than limit uncertainty values defined by the CISPR. The conformity of the sample is directly established by the applicable limits values. This table includes all uncertainties maximum feasible for testing in the laboratory, whether or not made in this report.