Fanvil H601W IP Phone DFS Test Report

TEST REPORT

Report Details

Report Number: TZ0059250308FRF21

Product Name: IP Phone

Model/Type reference: H601W, i501W

FCC ID: 2APPZ-H601W

Prepared for: Fanvil Technology Co., Ltd

10/F Block A, Dualshine Global Science Innovation Center, Honglang North 2nd Road, Bao'an District, Shenzhen, 518101, China

Prepared By: Shenzhen Tongzhou Testing Co.,Ltd.

1st Floor, Building 1, Haomai High-tech Park, Huating Road 387, Dalang Street, Longhua, Shenzhen, China

Standards: FCC CFR Title 47 Part 15E, FCC KDB 905462 D02 (v02)

Date of Test: Mar. 06, 2025~Apr. 30, 2025

Date of Issue: Apr. 30, 2025

Prepared by: Nancy Li

Reviewed by: Allen Lai

Approved by: Max Zhang (Authorized Officer)

This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial purposes as long as the Shenzhen Tongzhou Testing Co.,Ltd. is acknowledged as copyright owner and source of the material. Shenzhen Tongzhou Testing Co.,Ltd. takes no responsibility for and will not assume liability for damages resulting from the reader's interpretation of the reproduced material due to its placement and context. The test report apply only to the specific sample(s) tested under stated test conditions. It is not permitted to copy extracts of these test result without the written permission of the test laboratory.

Report Revise Record

Report VersionRevise TimeIssued DateValid VersionNotes
V1.0/Apr. 30, 2025ValidInitial release

1. GENERAL INFORMATION

1.1. Client Information

Applicant: Fanvil Technology Co., Ltd

Address: 10/F Block A, Dualshine Global Science Innovation Center, Honglang North 2nd Road, Bao'an District, Shenzhen, 518101, China

Manufacturer: Fanvil Technology Co., Ltd

Address: 10/F Block A, Dualshine Global Science Innovation Center, Honglang North 2nd Road, Bao'an District, Shenzhen, 518101, China

1.2. Description of Device (EUT)

Product Name: IP Phone

Trade Mark: Fanvil

Model Number: H601W, i501W

Model Declaration: All the same except for the model name, appearance color and appearance keys.

Test Model: H601W

Power Supply: DC 5V from adapter

Hardware version: V1.0

Software version: 2.12.20.4

1.3. Wireless Function Tested in this Report

Wi-Fi: Supported IEEE 802.11a/n/ac/ax

WLAN FCC Operation Frequency: U-NII 2A:5250MHz~5350MHz, U-NII 2C:5470MHz~5725MHz

Channel Bandwidth: 20MHz, 40MHz, 80MHz

WLAN Modulation Technology: IEEE 802.11a: OFDM (64QAM, 16QAM, QPSK, BPSK)
IEEE 802.11n: OFDM (64QAM, 16QAM, QPSK, BPSK)
IEEE 802.11ac: OFDM (256QAM, 64QAM, 16QAM, QPSK, BPSK)
IEEE 802.11ax: OFDM (1024-QAM, 256QAM, 64QAM, 16QAM, QPSK, BPSK)

DFS Operational Mode: Client without radar detection

Antenna Type And Gain: FPC Antenna for U- NII-2A:4.8dBi, U-NII-2C:5.4dBi

Note 1: Antenna position refer to EUT Photos.

Note 2: The above information was supplied by the applicant.

1.4. EUT configuration

The following peripheral devices and interface cables were connected during the measurement:

  • supplied by the manufacturer
  • supplied by the lab
ManufacturerModel:Input:Output:
Adapter1#Zhuzhoudachuan Electronic Technology CO., LtdDCT06W050100US-D0100-240V~50/60Hz 200mADC 5V, 1A
Adapter2#Fanvil Technology Co., LtdF05L5-050100SPAB100-240V~50/60Hz 0.2ADC 5V, 1A

1.5. Description of Test Facility

FCC

Designation Number: CN1275

Test Firm Registration Number: 167722

Shenzhen Tongzhou Testing Co.,Ltd has been listed on the US Federal Communications Commission list of test facilities recognized to perform electromagnetic emissions measurements.

A2LA

Certificate Number: 5463.01

Shenzhen Tongzhou Testing Co.,Ltd has been listed by American Association for Laboratory Accreditation to perform electromagnetic emission measurement.

IC

ISED#: 22033

CAB identifier: CN0099

Shenzhen Tongzhou Testing Co.,Ltd has been listed by Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada to perform electromagnetic emission measurement.

The 3m-Semi anechoic test site fulfils CISPR 16-1-4 according to ANSI C63.10 and CISPR 16-1-4:2010.

1.6. Statement of the Measurement Uncertainty

The data and results referenced in this document are true and accurate. The reader is cautioned that there may be errors within the calibration limits of the equipment and facilities. The measurement uncertainty was calculated for all measurements listed in this test report acc. To CISPR 16 – 4 "Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods - Part 4: Uncertainty in EMC Measurements" and is documented in the Shenzhen Tongzhou Testing Co.,Ltd quality system acc. To DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025. Furthermore, component and process variability of devices similar to that tested may result in additional deviation. The manufacturer has the sole responsibility of continued compliance of the device.

1.7. Measurement Uncertainty

Test ItemUncertaintyNote
DFS Signal Output Level±1.5dB(1)
Time±1.0%(1)

(1). This uncertainty represents an expanded uncertainty expressed at approximately the 95% confidence level using a coverage factor of k=2.

1.8. Description of Test Modes

The tests in this section are run sequentially and the UUT must pass all tests successfully. If the UUT fails any one of the tests it will count as a failure of compliance. To show compliance, all tests must be performed with waveforms randomly generated as specified with test results meeting the required percentage of successful detection criteria. One frequency will be chosen from the operating Channels of the UUT within the 5250-5350 MHz or 5470-5725 MHz bands.

2. TEST METHODOLOGY

All measurements contained in this report were conducted with FCC KDB 905462 D02 UNII DFS Compliance Procedures New Rules v02.

2.1. Test Sample

Sample IDDescription
TZ0059250308-2#Normal sample

2.2. Special Accessories

No.EquipmentManufacturerModel No.FCC ID
1Wireless RouterNETGEARR7800PY315100319

2.3. Summary of Test Result

Ref Std. ClauseDescription of TestResult
KDB 905462 7.8.1DFS: UNII Detection Bandwidth MeasurementN/A
KDB 905462 7.8.2.1DFS: Initial Channel Availability Check TimeN/A
KDB 905462 7.8.2.2DFS: Radar Burst at the Beginning of the Channel Availability Check TimeN/A
KDB 905462 7.8.2.3DFS: Radar Burst at the End of the Channel Availability Check TimeN/A
KDB 905462 7.8.3DFS: In-Service Monitoring for Channel Move Time (CMT)Pass
KDB 905462 7.8.3DFS: In-Service Monitoring for Channel Closing Transmission Time (CCTT)Pass
KDB 905462 7.8.3DFS: In-Service Monitoring for Non-Occupancy Period (NOP)Pass

Note: N/A means not applicable.

3. TEST RESULT

3.1. Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS) tests

3.1.1. Standard Applicable

The following table from FCC KDB 905462 D02 UNII DFS Compliance Procedures New Rules v02 lists the applicable requirements for the DFS testing.

Table 3-1: Applicability of DFS Requirements Prior to Use of a Channel
RequirementOperational Mode
MasterClient without Radar DetectionClient with Radar Detection
Non-Occupancy PeriodYesNot requiredYes
DFS Detection ThresholdYesNot requiredYes
Channel Availability Check TimeYesNot requiredNot required
U-NII Detection BandwidthYesNot requiredYes
Table 3-2: Applicability of DFS requirements during normal operation
RequirementOperational Mode
Master Device or Client with Radar DetectionClient with Radar Detection
Non-Occupancy PeriodYesNot required
DFS Detection ThresholdYesYes
Channel Availability Check TimeYesYes
U-NII Detection BandwidthYesNot required
Master Device or Client with Radar DetectionClient Without Radar Detection
Additional requirements for devices with multiple bandwidth modesAll BW modes must be testedNot required
U-NII Detection Bandwidth and Statistical Performance CheckTest using widest BW mode availableTest using the widest BW mode available for the link
Channel Move Time and Channel Closing Transmission TimeAny single BW modeNot required
All other testsAny single BW modeNot required

Note: Frequencies selected for statistical performance check should include several frequencies within the radar detection bandwidth and frequencies near the edge of the radar detection bandwidth. For 802.11 devices it is suggested to select frequencies in each of the bonded 20 MHz channels and the channel center frequency.

The following are the requirements for Client Devices:

  1. A Client Device will not transmit before having received appropriate control signals from a Master Device.
  2. A Client Device will stop all its transmissions whenever instructed by a Master Device to which it is associated and will meet the Channel Move Time and Channel Closing transmission time requirements. The Client Device will not resume any transmissions until it has again received control signals from a Master Device.
  3. If a Client Device is performing In-Service Monitoring and detects a Radar Waveform above the DFS Detection Threshold, it will inform the Master Device. This is equivalent to the Master Device detecting the Radar Waveform.
  4. Irrespective of Client Device or Master Device detection the Channel Move Time and Channel Closing Transmission Time requirements remain the same.
  5. The client test frequency must be monitored to ensure no transmission of any type has occurred for 30 minutes. Note: If the client moves with the master, the device is considered compliant if nothing appears in the client non-occupancy period test. For devices that shut down (rather than moving channels), no beacons should appear.
Table 3-3: DFS Response Requirements
ParameterValue
Non-occupancy periodMinimum 30 minutes
Channel Availability Check Time60 seconds
Channel Move Time10 seconds See Note 1.
Channel Closing Transmission Time200 milliseconds + an aggregate of 60 milliseconds over remaining 10 second period. See Notes 1 and 2.

Note 1: Channel Move Time and the Channel Closing Transmission Time should be performed with Radar Type 0. The measurement timing begins at the end of the Radar Type 0 burst.

Note 2: The Channel Closing Transmission Time is comprised of 200 milliseconds starting at the beginning of the Channel Move Time plus any additional intermittent control signals required to facilitate a Channel move (an aggregate of 60 milliseconds) during the remainder of the 10 second period. The aggregate duration of control signals will not count quiet periods in between transmissions.

Note 3: During the U-NII Detection Bandwidth detection test, radar type 0 should be used. For each frequency step the minimum percentage of detection is 90 percent. Measurements are performed with no data traffic.

Table 3-4: Detection Thresholds for Master Devices and Client Devices with Radar Detection
Maximum Transmit PowerValue (See Notes 1, 2, and 3)
Devices with an EIRP < 200mW and a Power Spectral Density < 10 dBm/MHz-62 dBm
Devices with 200mW ≤ EIRP ≤ 1 W-64 dBm

Note 1: This is the level at the input of the receiver assuming a 0 dBi receive antenna.

Note 2: Throughout these test procedures an additional 1 dB has been added to the amplitude of the test transmission waveforms to account for variations in measurement equipment. This will ensure that the test signal is at or above the detection threshold level to trigger a DFS response.

Note3: EIRP is based on the highest antenna gain. For MIMO devices refer to KDB Publication 662911 D01.

3.1.2. Block Diagram of Test Setup

The FCC KDB 905462 D02 UNII DFS Compliance Procedures New Rules v01 describes a radiated test setup and a conducted test setup. The conducted test setup was used for this testing. Figure 3-1 shows the typical test setup.

Figure 3-1: Conducted Test Setup where UUT is a Client and Radar Test Waveforms are injected into the Masters

Description: A block diagram illustrating a conducted test setup. It includes a Radar Test Signal Generator outputting to a 2-Way Splitter/Combiner, which then feeds into attenuators (ATT 10 dB) leading to a Spectrum Analyzer (with 10dB internal attenuation) and the UUT (Client). A Master device is also shown connected.

The conducted test setup was used for this calibration testing. Figure 3-2 shows the typical test setup.

Figure 3-2: Radar Waveform Calibration Conducted Test Setup

Description: A block diagram illustrating a conducted test setup for radar waveform calibration. It shows a Radar Test Signal Generator outputting to a 2-Way Splitter/Combiner via an ATT 10 dB. This combiner then feeds into another ATT 10 dB, which leads to another 2-Way Splitter/Combiner. From there, an ATT 30 dB leads to a Client device, and another ATT 10 dB leads to a Spectrum Analyzer (with 10 dB internal attenuation). A 50 ohm termination is also depicted.

3.1.3. Test Procedures

Radar Waveform Calibration Measurement

  1. The Interference Radar Detection Threshold Level is (-64dBm) + (0) [dBi] + 1 dB= -63 dBm that had been taken into account the output power range and antenna gain.
  2. The above equipment setup was used to calibrate the conducted Radar Waveform. A vector signal generator was utilized to establish the test signal level for each radar type.
  3. During this process there were replace 50ohm terminal form Master and Client device and no transmissions by either the Master or Client Device.
  4. The spectrum analyzer was switched to the zero span (Time Domain) at the frequency of the Radar Waveform generator. Peak detection was used.
  5. The spectrum analyzer resolution bandwidth (RBW) and video bandwidth (VBW) were set to at least 3MHz. The vector signal generator amplitude was set so that the power level measured at the spectrum analyzer was (-64dBm) + (0) [dBi] + 1 dB= -63dBm.
  6. Capture the spectrum analyzer plots on short pulse radar types, long pulse radar type and hopping radar waveform.

In-Service Monitoring Measurement

  1. The test should be performed with Radar Type 0. The measurement timing begins at the end of the Radar Type 0.
  2. When the radar burst with a level equal to the DFS Detection Threshold + 1dB is generated on the Operating Channel of the U-NII device. A U-NII device operating as a Master Device will associate with the Client Device at Channel. Stream the MPEG test file from the Master Device to the Client Device on the selected Channel for the entire period of the test. At time T0 the Radar Waveform generator sends a Burst of pulses for each of the radar types at Detection Threshold + 1dB.
  3. Observe the transmissions of the EUT at the end of the radar Burst on the Operating Channel. Measure and record the transmissions from the EUT during the observation time (Channel Move Time).
  4. Measurement of the aggregate duration of the Channel Closing Transmission Time method. with the spectrum analyzer set to zero span tuned to the center frequency of the EUT operating channel at the radar simulated frequency, peak detection, and max hold, the dwell time per bin is given by: Dwell (1.5ms) = S (12 sec) / B (8000); where Dwell is the dwell time per spectrum analyzer sampling bin, S is the sweep time and B is the number of spectrum analyzer sampling bins. An upper bound of the aggregate duration of the intermittent control signals of Channel Closing Transmission Time is calculated by: 80MHz: C = N X Dwell; where C is the Closing Time, N is the number of spectrum analyzer sampling bins showing a U-NII transmission and Dwell is the dwell time per bin.
  5. Measure the UUT for more than 30 minutes following the channel close/move time to verify that the UUT does not resume any transmissions on this Channel.

3.1.4. Test result

Radar Waveform Calibration Plot

Test Frequency: 5290 MHz

Radar #0 DFS detection threshold level

Calibration: U-NII-2A Band: For a detection threshold level of -62dBm and the antenna gain is 4.8dBi, required detection threshold is -56.2dBm (= -62+1+4.8).

Note: Maximum Transmit Power is Less than 200 milliwatt in this report, so detection threshold level is -62dBm.

Radar Waveform Calibration Plot

Test Frequency: 5610 MHz

Radar #0 DFS detection threshold level

Calibration: U-NII-2C Band: For a detection threshold level of -62dBm and the antenna gain is 5.4dBi, required detection threshold is -55.6dBm (= -62+1+5.4).

Note: Maximum Transmit Power is Less than 200 milliwatt in this report, so detection threshold level is -62dBm.

In-Service Monitoring

Test ModeRequirementMeasurement LevelLimitResult
802.11ac (VHT80) (5290MHz)Channel Closing Transmission Time0.00648s≤0.26sPass
Channel Move Time0.41958s≤10sPass
Non-Occupancy Period (min)≥ 30min≥ 30 minPass
802.11ac (VHT80) (5530MHz)Channel Closing Transmission Time0.00972s≤0.26sPass
Channel Move Time0.4779s≤10sPass
Non-Occupancy Period (min)≥ 30min≥ 30 minPass

Modulation Mode: 802.11ac (VHT80)

Freq. (MHz): 5290MHz

Radar Type Signal: 0

Channel Move Time and Channel Closing Transmission Time Plot Description: A graph showing signal level over time. It indicates the start of the radar signal (TO), the start of channel move time (T1), and the end of channel move time (T2). The plot confirms the channel move time and closing transmission time are within the specified limits.

Non-occupancy Period-Elapse time 30minutes Plot Description: A graph showing signal level over time, illustrating the 30-minute non-occupancy period. It marks the end of channel move time (TO) and the minimum non-occupancy period (T1). The plot demonstrates compliance with the non-occupancy period requirement.

Test Result: Complied

Modulation Mode: 802.11ac (VHT80)

Freq. (MHz): 5530MHz

Radar Type Signal: 0

Channel Move Time and Channel Closing Transmission Time Plot Description: A graph showing signal level over time. It indicates the start of the radar signal (TO), the start of channel move time (T1), and the end of channel move time (T2). The plot confirms the channel move time and closing transmission time are within the specified limits.

Non-occupancy Period-Elapse time 30minutes Plot Description: A graph showing signal level over time, illustrating the 30-minute non-occupancy period. It marks the end of channel move time (TO) and the minimum non-occupancy period (T1). The plot demonstrates compliance with the non-occupancy period requirement.

Test Result: Complied

4. LIST OF MEASURING EQUIPMENT

ItemTest EquipmentManufacturerModel No.Serial No.Calibration DateCalibration Due Date
1MXA Signal AnalyzerKeysightN9020AMY520916232024-12-312025-12-30
2Signal GeneratorKeysightN5182AMY46207092024-12-312025-12-30
3Fixed AttenuatorMini circuitsBW-S10-2W263A+N/A2024-12-312025-12-30
4RF CouplerAnritsuK241BN/A2024-12-312025-12-30
5Test SoftwareTonscendJS1120-3V3.2.22----

Test software used:

ItemTest SoftwareManufacturerNameVersion
1Test SoftwareTonscendJS1120-3V3.2.22

5. TEST SETUP PHOTOGRAPHS OF EUT

Please refer to separated files for Test Setup Photos of the EUT.

6. EXTERIOR PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE EUT

Please refer to separated files for External Photos of the EUT.

7. INTERIOR PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE EUT

Please refer to separated files for Internal Photos of the EUT.

----------------THE END OF REPORT---------------

PDF preview unavailable. Download the PDF instead.

GetApplicationAttachment.html?id=8325694 Microsoft Word 2021

Related Documents

Preview Maximum Permissible Exposure Report for H601W/i501W IP Phone
This report details the Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) evaluation for the Fanvil H601W and i501W IP Phone, including conducted power, manufacturing tolerances, and measurement results according to FCC regulations.
Preview Fanvil H601W IP Phone RF Test Data and Technical Specifications
This document provides detailed RF test data for the Fanvil H601W IP Phone (FCC ID: 2APPZ-H601W), covering bandwidth, conducted output power, and power spectral density measurements conducted by Shenzhen Tongzhou Testing Co., Ltd.
Preview Fanvil H601W IP Phone: 2.4GHz WLAN Conducted Measurement Test Report
This document presents the conducted measurement test data for the Fanvil H601W IP Phone, covering 2.4GHz WLAN performance including bandwidth, output power, power spectral density, and spurious emissions.
Preview Fanvil H601W/i501W IP Phone FCC Test Report
This document is a test report for the Fanvil H601W and i501W IP Phone, detailing compliance with FCC regulations for wireless devices. It includes results for conducted power, power spectral density, bandwidth, radiated emissions, and power line conducted emissions.
Preview Fanvil H601W/i501W IP Phone FCC Test Report
This FCC test report details the compliance testing for the Fanvil H601W and i501W IP Phone, covering wireless emissions and performance according to relevant standards.
Preview FCC Test Report: 2APPZ-H601W Spectrum Analysis and RF Performance
Detailed spectrum analysis and RF performance test results for the Fanvil H601W IP Phone (FCC ID: 2APPZ-H601W), including frequency band graphs and duty cycle measurements conducted by Shenzhen Tongzhou Testing Co., Ltd.
Preview Fanvil Technology Co., Ltd FCC Authorization for Change in Identification
Letter from Fanvil Technology Co., Ltd to the FCC requesting authorization for a change in identification for their IP Phone, referencing FCC ID 2APPZ-H601W and 2BCUQ-H601W.
Preview U.S. Agent Letter of Attestation - Fanvil Technology Co., Ltd
Official U.S. Agent Letter of Attestation for Fanvil Technology Co., Ltd, designating Oasis Compliance, Inc. as the agent for FCC ID 2APPZ-H601W.