Understanding Light Perception
The human eye responds to low light levels by enlarging the pupil, allowing more light to enter the eye. This response results in a difference between measured and perceived light levels.
A lamp that is dimmed to 10% of its maximum measured light output is perceived as being dimmed to only 32%. Likewise, a lamp dimmed to 1% is perceived to be at 10%.
Design Example Scenarios
At full brightness, the measured light in a space is 60 foot-candles. At the lowest dimmed level, 10% perceived light is desired.
- 1% measured light (0.6 fcd) is perceived as 10% (desired result)
- 5% measured light (3 fcd) is perceived as 22% (2x brighter than desired)
- 10% measured light (6 fcd) is perceived as 32% (3x brighter than desired)
Visualizing Light Dimming
The relationship between measured and perceived light is illustrated in a graph. The Y-axis represents 'Measured Light' (from 1% to 100%), and the X-axis represents 'Perceived Light' (from 0% to 100%).
The graph displays several dimming curves, indicating how different dimming strategies affect perceived brightness:
- 1% Architectural dimming: This corresponds to very low measured light levels, where perceived brightness is significantly higher than measured.
- 5% High performance dimming: This range covers slightly higher measured light levels.
- 10% Lighting management dimming: This covers a broader range of measured light, offering a different perceived brightness curve.
A curved line shows how perceived light is non-linear with measured light, particularly at lower levels. For instance, achieving 10% perceived light requires only 1% measured light in architectural dimming, while higher measured light percentages are needed for the same perceived brightness in other dimming types.
An illustration depicts a light meter device displaying a reading of 0.875. The concept of perceived light is symbolized by an eye ?️.
Formula for Perceived Light
Perceived Light (%) = 100 x √ (Measured Light (%) / 100)
Source: IESNA Lighting Handbook, 9th Edition, (New York; IESNA, 2000), 27-4.