3B-LOGO

3B Fabry Perot Interferometer

3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-product

Specifications

  • Model: UE5020900 Atomic and Nuclear Physics product Atomic Shell
  • Resolution: High resolution for small spectral splittings
  • Dimension: d = 4mm, n = 1.4567
  • Reflectivity: R = 0.85

Fabry-Pérot Interferometer, Determination of the Bohr Magneton

SPECTROSCOPY WITH A FABRY-PÉROT ETALON

  • Experimental introduction to the Fabry-Pérot interferometer using the example of the normal Zeeman effect
  • Measuring the interference rings of the Fabry-Pérot etalon as a function of the external magnetic field
  • Determination of the Bohr Magneton

UE5020900
09/24 UD

OVERVIEW

3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-1Fig. 1: Experimental setup for the normal Zeeman effect in a longitudinal configuration

GENERAL PRINCIPLES

The Fabry-Pérot interferometer, developed by its name-sakes Charles Fabry and Alfred Pérot, is an optical resonator consisting of two semi-transparent mirrors. A Fabry-Pérot interferometer with a fixed distance between the mir-rors is known as a Fabry-Pérot etalon. As it is designed to fulfill the resonance condition for a specific wavelength, the etalon also acts as an optical filter. An incident light beam is reflected several times in the etalon so that the light beams transmitted with each reflection interfere with each other. This multi-beam interference produces an intensity distribution in transmission with narrow maxima and broad minima. Together with the high interference or-der at correspondingly large resonator dimensions, this results in a high optical quality and correspondingly high resolution. This means that small spectral splittings, such as those present in the normal Zeeman effect at the red Cd line (3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-29 = 643.8 nm, 3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-30= 0.0068 nm at B = 350 mT), can be resolved.

3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-2Fig. 2: Beam path in the Fabry-Pérot etalon

  • A theoretical description of the normal Zeeman effect can be found in the instructions for experiment UE5020850, in which the doublet and triplet splitting is investigated qualitatively.
  • The focus of this experiment is on spectroscopy with a Fabry-Pérot etalon. The Fabry-Pérot etalon is positioned in front of the camera together with imaging optics, which is used to observe Zeeman splitting.
  • When the light from the cadmium lamp passes through the Fabry-Pérot etalon, interference rings are created which, like the spectral line, split depending on the external magnetic field and are imaged onto the camera by the optics. Observation parallel or perpendicular to the external magnetic field is made possible by a rotating electromagnet.
  • The Fabry-Pérot etalon consists of a quartz glass plate with a semi-reflective mirror coating of high reflectivity on both sides (Fig. 2). In this case, the etalon is designed in such a way that the resonance condition for the wavelength 3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-29 = 643,8 nm of the red Cd line is fulfilled. In this sense, the etalon also acts as an optical filter. The thickness d, the refractive index, and the reflection coefficient R of the etalon are as follows:

3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-3An incident light beam is reflected several times in the etalon. The light beams transmitted during each reflection interfere with each other. The path difference 3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-31 between two neighbor-ing transmitted light beams, e.g. the light beams emerging at points B and D in Fig. 2, is:

3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-4and from this, the condition for the existence of interference maxima:

3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-5

Overall, an interference pattern of concentric rings is generated. The refraction at the boundary surfaces of the glass plate of the Fabry-Pérot etalon can be neglected as it only shifts the interference pattern in parallel. Therefore, the refraction angle 3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-32is replaced by the incidence angle 3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-33, and the interference condition (8) results in

3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-63B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-34

The interference pattern is imaged onto the camera using a convex lens (Fig. 3). The following relationship exists between the angle3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-33k at which the kth order interference ring appears, the radius rk of the kth order interference ring and the focal length f of the lens (Fig. 3):

3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-7

with the small angle approximation tan(x) 3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-35 x. Equation (9) follows for the interference order k and the angle 3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-36
3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-8and3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-93B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-9According to equation (11), because of |cos(3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-36)| 3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-37 1, the interference order k is maximum for 3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-36 = 0, i.e. in the center of the interference rings, and corresponds to the parameter k0, which is generally not a whole number. Since the interference rings are counted from the center in the experiment, the interference order k is indexed with a whole number j, which identifies the kth interference order with the jth interference ring counted from the center, in generalization of the parameter k0 already introduced. The first bright interference ring with order k1 appears according to equation (12) at the angle

3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-11

where k1 is the next whole number that is smaller than k0. As k0 is generally not a whole number, the difference between k0 – and k1 is less than 1. Therefore, a parameter 3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-38 is defined as follows:3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-12

For all interference rings with j 3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-392, the order number kj is decreased by 1 in each case, so that for the interference order of the jth interference ring counted from the center the following is generally true3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-13

For j = 1, equation (15) just corresponds to the definition  3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-38 from equation (14). Substituting equations (12) (with k = kj) and (15) into equation (10) results in3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-14

where, for the sake of simplicity, 3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-40 was set for indexing without restriction of generality. This convention is retained in the following. It follows from equation (16) that the difference between the radius squares of neighboring interference rings is constant

3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-15

From equations (16) and (17) follows:3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-16If the interference rings are split into two very closely spaced components a and b, whose wavelengths differ only slightly from each other, for the first interference ring counted from the center, for example, follows from equation (14):

3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-17

Since the two components belong to the same interference order, and provided that the interference rings do not overlap by more than one whole order, k1,a = k1,b and thus:

3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-18

Equation (20) does not explicitly depend on the interference order. If equation (18) is formulated for both components a and b and inserted into equation (20), the following results:3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-19

From equation (17) it follows that the difference of the radius squares of the component a or b for neighboring interference orders j and j+1 with j > 0 due to 3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-41 and thus k0,a 3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-35 k0,b are approximately equal:

3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-20

Accordingly, the following applies for two components a and b of the same interference order j with j > 0:3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-22

Substituting equations (22) and (23) into equation (21) results in:3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-23Since equation (22) applies to both components a and b of neighboring interference rings and equation (23) applies to all interference rings, mean values3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-24

The ratio 3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-42 can be measured as a function of the magnetic flux density B, plotted graphically, and the Bohr magneton 3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-43B can be determined from the slope a of a linear fit.

EQUIPMENT LIST

3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-44

SETUP AND SAFETY INSTRUCTIONS

The procedure of this experiment requires that the assembly of the components as well as the experimental setup and adjustment have been carried out according to the instructions for the experiment UE5020850, considering all the safety instructions formulated therein. The maximum current through the coil D with 900 turns is 5 A (7 minutes). It can be doubled for short periods (30 seconds). The coils have an internal reversible thermal fuse that trips at a winding temperature of 85°C. The reset time is 10-20 minutes, depending on the ambient temperature.

  • Carry out the measurement quickly enough to prevent the thermal fuse from tripping due to high currents flowing for too long.
  • Do not operate the coils without a transformer core.

EXPERIMENT PROCEDURE
Measurement

  • Establish the transversal configuration by rotating the electromagnetic as described in the instruction manual for the experiment UE5020850.

3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-25

Fig. 4: Calibration curve of the electromagnet

  • Focus the 12 mm lens so that the three interference rings of the innermost order, for which they appear clearly separated from each other, are in focus. Do not move the con-vex lenses (imaging and condenser lens) and do not refocus the 12 mm lens, otherwise, the evaluation will give incorrect results.
  • Note:
    Due to the temperature sensitivity of Fabry-Pérot etalons, the center of the interference rings may look different depending on the ambient temperature and may therefore differ from the screenshots in this manual.
  • Switch on the DC power supply unit, increase the current through the coils first to 3 A, then in 0.5 A steps to 5 A. At each step, take a screenshot (“snapshot”) with the camera software and save it as a “JPEG”.
  • Note:
  • When increasing the current, make sure that the interference rings do not overlap by more than one whole order.

Calibration of the electromagnet
The values for the magnetic flux densities B, which correspond to the set currents I, can be taken from the calibration curve in Fig. 4 or Tab. 1. Alternatively, the calibration curve can be measured as follows:

  • Remove the Cd lamp on the housing from the base plate.
  • Place a Tesla meter in the air gap between the two pole pieces (approx. 10 mm) so that the magnetic field sensor is centered.
  • Switch on the DC power supply unit and increase the current I through the coils in 0.5 A steps. At each step, meas-ure the values for the magnetic flux density B, note them and plot them against the set currents.
  • Reduce the current to zero and switch off the DC power supply unit.
  • Insert the Cd lamp back into the base plate.

Tab 1: Calibration of the electromagnet. Set currents I and measured magnetic flux densities B

I / AB / mTI / AB / mT
0.005.0458
0.5465.5489
1.01016.0518
1.51486.5540
2.01947.0556
2.52397.5574
3.02888.0589
3.53348.5602
4.03779.0614
4.54229.5625

MEASUREMENT EXAMPLE AND EVALUATION

The following steps are to be carried out for each saved screen-shot:

  • Open a screenshot in the camera software (click on “File” in the menu bar and select “Open image”).
  • Click on “Options” in the menu bar, then on “Measurement”, select “Length Unit” in the window that opens, tick “Pixel” under “Current” and confirm the setting by clicking on “OK”.
  • Click on the “Circle” button in the toolbar and select “3 Points”. Place a circle on the innermost interference ring. This is referred to as “C1” in the following.

The “Measurement” window opens automatically.3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-26

Fig. 5: Triplet splitting of the red cadmium line (I = 5.0 A ≙ B = 458 mT). Interference rings marked with circles to determine the enclosed areas

  • If necessary, adjust the appearance under “Appearance” (e.g. line width/color, show/hide label type).
  • Under “Geometry”, note the numerical value for the area in pixels (Tab. 2). Mark further interference rings in the same way (C2-C9, Fig. 5) and note the areas (Tab. 2). Click on the “Track” button (hand symbol) to complete the process.
  • Click on “Layer” in the menu bar, select “Merge to image” and click on “OK”.
  • Click on “File” in the menu bar, select “Save as” and save the image as a JPEG with a meaningful name.

Note:
The unit of the area is irrelevant for further evaluation, as only relative values and ratios are calculated, not absolute values. The absolute values of the areas (Tab. 2) can deviate significantly depending on the position of the optics.

  • Calculate the area differences 3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-45of the corresponding components of neighboring interference orders (Eq. (22), Tab. 3; circles C4↔C1, C5↔C2, C6↔C3, C7↔C4, C8↔C5, C9↔C6).
  • Calculate the area differences 3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-46 of neighboring components of the same interference orders (Eq. (23), Tab. 4; circles C2↔C1, C3↔C2, C5↔C4, C6↔C5, C8↔C7, C9↔C8).
  • Calculate the mean values from all area differences in Tab. 3 and 4 (Eq. (25), (26)) and enter them in the tables.
  • Calculate the ratio 3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-42 of the mean values for all set cur-rents or magnetic flux densities, respectively (Tab. 5). Take the corresponding values for the magnetic flux density from the calibration curve of the electromagnet (Fig. 4, Tab. 1).
  • Plot the ratio 3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-42 as a function of the magnetic flux density B and fit a straight line through the origin (Fig. 6).3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-27Fig. 6: Ratio 3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-42of the area differences as a function of the magnetic flux density B. The slope of the fitted straight line through the origin is a = 0.53 / T

Determine the Bohr magneton from the slope a = 0.53 / T of the fitted straight line using equation (29):

3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-28

The value corresponds to the literature value 9.3 10 24 J/T except for approx. 3%.

Tab. 2: Areas A enclosed by the interference rings determined with the help of the camera software

 

I / A

Area A / Pixel
C1C2C3C4C5C6C7C8C9
3.0167734200055229205367830398701430412559306592777620040
3.5161486200196234474365742400854434853554225592457622683
4.0157753199493238088358148398737439637552909592559624921
4.5151447200768241074354744399174442546548700591057629975
5.0146500201657248223352695398436448720546544591877633671

Tab. 3: Area differences 3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-45 of the corresponding components of neighboring interference orders

Tab. 4: Area differences 3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-46 of neighboring components of the same interference orders

3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-48Tab. 5: Ratio 3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-42 of the area differences for different currents I or magnetic flux densities B, respectively

I / AB / T3B-Fabry-Perot-Interferometer-FIG-42
3.00.2880.157
3.50.3340.179
4.00.3770.199
4.50.4220.220
5.00.4580.242

CONTACT

  • Scientific GmbH, Ludwig-Erhard-Straße 20, 20459 Hamburg, Germany, www.3bscientific.com
  • Subject to technical amendments

© Copyright 2024 3B Scientific GmbH

Documents / Resources

3B Fabry Perot Interferometer [pdf] Instructions
Fabry Perot Interferometer, Interferometer

References

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *